IP & Takedown Complaints Policy

Dreamboard respects copyright, trademark, moral rights, privacy, publicity, and contractual licence conditions. Users must upload or publish only material they have the right to use. Dreamboard reviews the source and licence information for catalog works, but a permissive copyright licence does not by itself clear trademarks, personality rights, or misleading endorsement.

Send the following to legal@dreamboard.games:

• your name and reliable contact details;
• the right you own or are authorised to enforce;
• the specific work, mark, person, or material concerned;
• the Studio catalog ID, URL, project/share link, export, screenshot, or other location that lets us identify the material;
• why you believe the use is unauthorised, incorrectly attributed, misleading, or otherwise unlawful;
• the outcome you request, such as correction, credit, access restriction, or removal;
• a statement that the information is accurate and that you act in good faith; and
• your physical or electronic signature.

Do not send identity documents unless we specifically request a proportionate verification method. This is an Australian complaints process, not a claim that a particular overseas notice regime applies.

We will acknowledge a sufficiently detailed complaint, assess it in a reasonable period, preserve relevant evidence, and may ask for more information. Depending on the issue, we may correct credits, restrict access, stop export/publication, remove a catalog item, notify the affected user or source provider, or decline the request with reasons.

We may take temporary action while investigating where continued availability creates a credible risk. We will consider fair dealing, licences, ownership evidence, context, and competing rights rather than automatically deciding every dispute for the complainant.

If we restrict your material, we may tell you the basis and let you provide evidence of ownership, permission, licence compliance, or another lawful basis, unless law or safety prevents disclosure. We may restore or modify access if the evidence resolves the concern.

We may suspend users who repeatedly infringe or repeatedly ignore attribution obligations where proportionate to the circumstances. We may also reject complaints that are knowingly false, abusive, impersonating, or designed to suppress lawful speech or competition. Nothing here prevents either party seeking legal advice or a remedy from a court or authority.